An entirely different matter had come across the fact that the self-greenhouse theory, there is sti

LATEST Fallibilistinen symbol of the recession, seed sowing, Passions, and biofuels Buy death of predatory capitalism under control red line between the wood and bark, Olli? Points by Greek exit? Mega Mega solution to the problem? Ilmastoylpe t Mursiko Egypt I broke? Good losses do as you're told Turkey, more and more severe

I notice that my site has been a few people that just confused ilmastonmuutospuheistani. Which is found in Al Gore's film on climate change, or read the magazine articles, one can legitimately wonder about a politician revco who can afford to play down any threat. After all, they take place, if we do not achieve a binding climate agreement. Or what?

I was not the only one, but no doubt I was one of the first Finnish revco politicians who deliberately pushed the threat of climate change policy agenda. The first of his column I wrote in 1994 on the Green Lanka, a columnist I was five years. The first eurovaaleissani 1999 climate change was the main topic. "There should not turn on the people," was returned, of which I was indifferent to the hassle-free. No such extrapolate, I thought. I was concerned about the consequences of climate change revco on nature and society. I read the warnings of environmental organizations. I followed the scientific research, the reliability is not a philosopher, I had no particular revco reason to doubt. Professor Ilkka Chipping islet I learned that science corrects itself, if we live in normal conditions, scientific and political control




patronize research.

But that identify the problem, does not logically follow that it was invented right solution. Criticality of environmental organizations grew as legislator, I found that climate revco policy is implemented in a really stupid way. Even if that is intended, the Kyoto Protocol has increased its emissions in both absolute terms and in relative terms. The emissions are not reduced when they are transferred to another location, overall emissions are growing up, and more pollution.

It does not make me self-critical kasvihuoneteorialle, I realized just how much some people make a business errand. Likewise, some will increase the political revco ego enthusiasm, but care about climate policy, the results surprisingly little. The EU was a kind of one: climate policy, it received international leadership and a forum in which to bask in the attention revco to the other with the leadership went worse. I realized that climate change is some politicians very "convenient truth", a pleasant truth, self-assertion which provides a good field of play without the actual responsibility.

I found that the environmental revco groups were quite at ease with the idea that developing countries revco continue to increase their emissions exponentially, as long as we industrialized countries cutting 2050, from 80 to 90 per cent. The tricky equation when 2/3 of the emissions to grow there, and China's emissions alone are in mm. Science magazine estimates that as high in 2030 as the entire world now.

I came to the conclusion that the whole Kyoto path pst kauppoineen was a mistake, because dekarbonisaatio has stopped and things tehdnkin more dirty, revco if you look at emissions per tonne of production. Must be in the other, and the other for me it is aware of the economic dekarbonisointi revco all over the world. Or a carbon tax. Global trade in any event must be based on the fact that only the production of clean and minimal emissions as a criterion. Specific BAT, industry-specific emission limit, the theoretical minimum, benchmarking - it can be called whatever, but this is the principle I have been driving since 2001, when the first emissions trading legislation was made.

An entirely different matter had come across the fact that the self-greenhouse theory, there is still a lot of confusion. Just when it was learned that the growth of emissions on temperature rise - the last century, the temperature rose by 0.7 degrees - the coolness of the past decade has not complied with the predictions, although emissions have grown exponentially. A time series is too short for drawing conclusions, but at least we can admit that climate revco change is a more complex phenomenon than expected and we do not know enough yet - but that's not surprising in science.

IPCC report revco any errors, some of which were even intentional, are the subject revco of a new confusion. If I was one of the first politicians who brought the climate revco change, I would also be the first to recognize the potential fallacy. Misdirection is not the name of science to accept, under any circumstances, not even when it is done for a good cause. Now, it seems that the EU's sources of information are at least partially borne by the climate change exaggeration and inaccuracy. Exaggeration should not downplay the seriousness, such as Finland is in many circles made, among others. The Finnish revco Meteorological Institute contributors. Science research to call the fire shall require reliable methods because of the big and expensive for climate action required public support. That support will disappear, if confidence in the impartiality of the research
Full Post